Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-05-02 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:46 PM, array chip wrote: > David, > > Thanks for the 2 previous posts from Sarkar. Actually, I am now one step > closer. I am now able > to remove the 3 outer lines of the bounding box using par.box argument, even > Sarkar said in > his 2008 post that par.box() does not

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-09 Thread array chip
id Winsemius > Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe() > To: "array chip" > Cc: r-help@r-project.org > Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 3:48 PM > I do not think the mail server > accepts .jpg formats which was theĀ  > format in which I got your attachment

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-09 Thread David Winsemius
e, here it is: Thanks John --- On Fri, 4/9/10, array chip wrote: From: array chip Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe() To: "David Winsemius" , "Felix Andrews" > Cc: r-help@r-project.org Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 1:09 PM Hi David and Felix, Thank y

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-09 Thread array chip
Sorry the example plot didn't go through last time, here it is: Thanks John --- On Fri, 4/9/10, array chip wrote: > From: array chip > Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe() > To: "David Winsemius" , "Felix Andrews" > > Cc: r-he

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-09 Thread array chip
axes are draw ) Thank you all very much for the help. It's fun to learn. John --- On Thu, 4/8/10, Felix Andrews wrote: > From: Felix Andrews > Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe() > To: "David Winsemius" > Cc: "array chip" , r-help@r-pro

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-08 Thread Felix Andrews
y(x), each = 3), y = min(y), z = c(range(z),NA), ..., border="grey", lwd=2) }) > >> >> Many thanks >> >> John >> >> >> --- On Thu, 4/8/10, David Winsemius wrote: >> >>> From: David Winsemius >>> Subjec

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-08 Thread David Winsemius
o use a lattice function there is a panel.grid, but I still suspect it will need to be 3dto3d transformed onto one of the "lim" extremes. Many thanks John --- On Thu, 4/8/10, David Winsemius wrote: From: David Winsemius Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe() To: &

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-08 Thread array chip
D dataset. Hope I have explained clearly this time. Many thanks John --- On Thu, 4/8/10, David Winsemius wrote: > From: David Winsemius > Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe() > To: "array chip" > Cc: r-help@r-project.org > Date: Thursday, April 8,

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-08 Thread David Winsemius
d with a z argument of zlim.scaled[2]. I would think that a grid could be 3dto3d transformed similarly. -- David. Thank you all for the help. It's fun to play with wireframe John --- On Wed, 4/7/10, David Winsemius wrote: From: David Winsemius Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface u

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-08 Thread array chip
rom: David Winsemius > Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe() > To: "array chip" > Cc: r-help@r-project.org > Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 9:22 PM > > On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:58 PM, array chip wrote: > > > With the help document, i finally fi

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-08 Thread array chip
Scott, This is a good explanation and a good practice. Thank you, John --- On Thu, 4/8/10, Waichler, Scott R wrote: > From: Waichler, Scott R > Subject: Re: 3-D response surface using wireframe() > To: "arrayprof...@yahoo.com" > Cc: "r-help@r-project.org" > Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010, 9

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-08 Thread Waichler, Scott R
Regarding the screen argument in wireframe(), here is what I understand about how it works after much trial-and-error: After each rotation, new axes are in effect defined for the next rotation as at the start: x is to the right of the 2D view, y is towards the top, and z is positive out of the

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-07 Thread David Winsemius
re one way to plot x and y axis on the bottom of the plot? Look at the scpos argument to specify the scales location. (Still lacking an example and therrefore doing this from memory.) -- David Thanks John --- On Wed, 4/7/10, David Winsemius wrote: From: David Winsemius Subject: R

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-07 Thread array chip
f the plot? Thanks John --- On Wed, 4/7/10, David Winsemius wrote: > From: David Winsemius > Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe() > To: "array chip" > Cc: r-help@r-project.org > Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 8:07 AM > A search with the following

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-07 Thread array chip
Thank you David. The document is very helpful. I had a typo in my 2nd example plot, one of the "z" is "x", "z" is the vertical one. Thanks John --- On Wed, 4/7/10, David Winsemius wrote: > From: David Winsemius > Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface

Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()

2010-04-07 Thread David Winsemius
A search with the following strategy: RSiteSearch("lattice wireframe rotate axes") Followed by adding requests to search earlier years' archives produced this link which has a further link to a document that answers most of your questions, at least the ones that are comprehensible: http://