On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:46 PM, array chip wrote:
> David,
>
> Thanks for the 2 previous posts from Sarkar. Actually, I am now one step
> closer. I am now able
> to remove the 3 outer lines of the bounding box using par.box argument, even
> Sarkar said in
> his 2008 post that par.box() does not
id Winsemius
> Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()
> To: "array chip"
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 3:48 PM
> I do not think the mail server
> accepts .jpg formats which was theĀ
> format in which I got your attachment
e, here it is:
Thanks
John
--- On Fri, 4/9/10, array chip wrote:
From: array chip
Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()
To: "David Winsemius" , "Felix Andrews" >
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 1:09 PM
Hi David and Felix,
Thank y
Sorry the example plot didn't go through last time, here it is:
Thanks
John
--- On Fri, 4/9/10, array chip wrote:
> From: array chip
> Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()
> To: "David Winsemius" , "Felix Andrews"
>
> Cc: r-he
axes are draw
)
Thank you all very much for the help. It's fun to learn.
John
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, Felix Andrews wrote:
> From: Felix Andrews
> Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()
> To: "David Winsemius"
> Cc: "array chip" , r-help@r-pro
y(x), each = 3), y = min(y), z =
c(range(z),NA),
..., border="grey", lwd=2)
})
>
>>
>> Many thanks
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> --- On Thu, 4/8/10, David Winsemius wrote:
>>
>>> From: David Winsemius
>>> Subjec
o use a lattice function there
is a panel.grid, but I still suspect it will need to be 3dto3d
transformed onto one of the "lim" extremes.
Many thanks
John
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, David Winsemius wrote:
From: David Winsemius
Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()
To: &
D dataset. Hope I have explained
clearly this time.
Many thanks
John
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, David Winsemius wrote:
> From: David Winsemius
> Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()
> To: "array chip"
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Date: Thursday, April 8,
d with a z argument of
zlim.scaled[2]. I would think that a grid could be 3dto3d transformed
similarly.
--
David.
Thank you all for the help. It's fun to play with wireframe
John
--- On Wed, 4/7/10, David Winsemius wrote:
From: David Winsemius
Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface u
rom: David Winsemius
> Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()
> To: "array chip"
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 9:22 PM
>
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:58 PM, array chip wrote:
>
> > With the help document, i finally fi
Scott,
This is a good explanation and a good practice.
Thank you,
John
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, Waichler, Scott R wrote:
> From: Waichler, Scott R
> Subject: Re: 3-D response surface using wireframe()
> To: "arrayprof...@yahoo.com"
> Cc: "r-help@r-project.org"
> Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010, 9
Regarding the screen argument in wireframe(), here is what I understand about
how it works after much trial-and-error:
After each rotation, new axes are in effect defined for the next rotation as at
the start: x is to the right of the 2D view, y is towards the top, and z is
positive out of the
re one way to plot x and y axis on
the bottom of the plot?
Look at the scpos argument to specify the scales location. (Still
lacking an example and therrefore doing this from memory.)
--
David
Thanks
John
--- On Wed, 4/7/10, David Winsemius wrote:
From: David Winsemius
Subject: R
f the plot?
Thanks
John
--- On Wed, 4/7/10, David Winsemius wrote:
> From: David Winsemius
> Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface using wireframe()
> To: "array chip"
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 8:07 AM
> A search with the following
Thank you David. The document is very helpful.
I had a typo in my 2nd example plot, one of the "z" is "x", "z" is the vertical
one.
Thanks
John
--- On Wed, 4/7/10, David Winsemius wrote:
> From: David Winsemius
> Subject: Re: [R] 3-D response surface
A search with the following strategy:
RSiteSearch("lattice wireframe rotate axes")
Followed by adding requests to search earlier years' archives produced
this link which has a further link to a document that answers most of
your questions, at least the ones that are comprehensible:
http://
16 matches
Mail list logo