Thanks for all the help.
I also checked Dalgaard's R book and the explanation of the wilcox.test is
very clear compared to the example in R documentation. Thanks. :handshake:
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/wilcox.test-construction-in-r-tp26148779p26156041.html
Sent from
Dear Stefan,
See two comments inserted below.
Stefan Grosse wrote:
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:47:50 -0700 (PDT) jomni wrote:
J> So do I write the function as wilcox.test(original, test,
J> alternative="l")? or wlcox.test(original, test, alternative = "g")?
J> or wilcox.test(test, original, alterna
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:47:50 -0700 (PDT) jomni wrote:
J> So do I write the function as wilcox.test(original, test,
J> alternative="l")? or wlcox.test(original, test, alternative = "g")?
J> or wilcox.test(test, original, alternative="g")?
J> or wilcox.test(test, original, alternative="l")?
J> How
Hi, I am very confused with constructing the wilcox.test in R.
I have two populations 'original' and 'test'.
I want to know if the 'test' is generally 'lower' than original.
I use alpha of 0.05.
So do I write the function as wilcox.test(original, test, alternative="l")?
or wlcox.test(original, t
4 matches
Mail list logo