Achim Zeileis wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, David Croll wrote:
Am I paranoid, or am I in search of an exactness statistics cannot
deliver?
Paranoid. ;-) With your sample size all solutions should be sufficiently
close to exact.
Well, the world could still be out to get him... It is required
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, David Croll wrote:
Dear Achim,
let me thank you for this assurance!
The sample size is too large (~4000 observations per group) to solve this
problem exactly. The error message could maybe be improved, but the message
is clear: This is too large to deal with.
However
Dear Achim,
let me thank you for this assurance!
The sample size is too large (~4000 observations per group) to solve
this problem exactly. The error message could maybe be improved, but
the message is clear: This is too large to deal with.
However, this is not a problem. With several thou
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, David Croll wrote:
Dear R friends,
here I write again about the wilcox.exact() problem. I want to compare two sets of categorical
data, and in one case it says "negative length vectors not allowed", and in the other one
I get the error "cannot allocate vector of length ..
Dear R friends,
here I write again about the wilcox.exact() problem. I want to compare two sets
of categorical data, and in one case it says "negative length vectors not
allowed", and in the other one I get the error "cannot allocate vector of
length ...".
On http://rapidshare.com/files/298
5 matches
Mail list logo
