> Gerrit Eichner
> on Fri, 8 Jun 2018 12:55:31 +0200 writes:
> Am 08.06.2018 um 12:02 schrieb Martin Maechler:
>>> Martin Maechler
>>> on Fri, 8 Jun 2018 11:13:24 +0200 writes:
>>
>> [..]
>>
>> >> Thank you, Chris, for the report and
>
Am 08.06.2018 um 12:02 schrieb Martin Maechler:
Martin Maechler
on Fri, 8 Jun 2018 11:13:24 +0200 writes:
[..]
>> Thank you, Chris, for the report and
>> Gerrit for your proposed fix !!
>>
>> It looks good to me, but I will test some more (also with
>> 'r
> Martin Maechler
> on Fri, 8 Jun 2018 11:13:24 +0200 writes:
[..]
>> Thank you, Chris, for the report and
>> Gerrit for your proposed fix !!
>>
>> It looks good to me, but I will test some more (also with
>> 'row1attop=FALSE') before committing the bug
> Martin Maechler
> on Thu, 7 Jun 2018 18:35:48 +0200 writes:
> Gerrit Eichner
> on Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:03:46 +0200 writes:
>> Hi, Chris, had the same problem (and first thought it was
>> my fault), but there seems to be a typo in the code of
>> pairs.default.
> Gerrit Eichner
> on Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:03:46 +0200 writes:
> Hi, Chris, had the same problem (and first thought it was
> my fault), but there seems to be a typo in the code of
> pairs.default. Below is a workaround. Look for two
> comments (starting with #) in t
Hi, Chris,
had the same problem (and first thought it was my fault), but there
seems to be a typo in the code of pairs.default. Below is a workaround.
Look for two comments (starting with #) in the code to see what I
have changed to make it work at least the way I'd expect it in one of
your e
After making scatterplot matrix, I determined I only needed the first 2 columns
of the matrix so I added verInd=1:2 to my pairs() call. However, it did not
turn out as I expected.
Perhaps the attached pdf of the example code will make it through. If not, my
description is "the wrong scatter
7 matches
Mail list logo
