t;> weight ones. right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ricardo Gonçalves Silva wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nowdays there's a lot o new variable selection methods, specially
>>>>>> using
he way what is the dimension of your problem?
>
> HTH,
>
> Rick
> --
> From: "Frank E Harrell Jr"
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 4:12 PM
> To: "Ricardo Gonçalves Silva"
> Cc: "bbslover" ;
> Subject: Re: [R] variable selectin---
dimension of your problem?
HTH,
Rick
--
From: "Frank E Harrell Jr"
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 4:12 PM
To: "Ricardo Gonçalves Silva"
Cc: "bbslover" ;
Subject: Re: [R] variable selectin---reduce the numbers of in
weight of
> each variable in the PC.
>
> HTH
>
> Rick
>
> --
> From: "bbslover"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:23 AM
> To:
> Subject: [R] variable selectin---reduce the numbers of initial variable
&g
he PC.
HTH
Rick
--
From: "bbslover"
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:23 AM
To:
Subject: [R] variable selectin---reduce the numbers of initial variable
hello,
my problem is like this: now after processing the varibles, the remaini
hello,
my problem is like this: now after processing the varibles, the remaining
160 varibles(independent) and a dependent y. when I used PLS method, with 10
components, the good r2 can be obtained. but I donot know how can I express
my equation with the less varibles and the y. It is better to
6 matches
Mail list logo
