Re: [R] unexpected plot behavior

2012-04-22 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:25 AM, Martin Renner wrote: > Thank you for the replies, Uwe and Marc. These are explanations that make > perfect sense. However, shouldn't the behavior of plot.factor include the > option of type = "n" for consistency with the default plot function? > > Best, > Martin

Re: [R] unexpected plot behavior

2012-04-22 Thread Martin Renner
Thank you for the replies, Uwe and Marc. These are explanations that make perfect sense. However, shouldn't the behavior of plot.factor include the option of type = "n" for consistency with the default plot function? Best, Martin On 21 Apr 2012, at 08:18 , Marc Schwartz wrote: > On Apr 21,

Re: [R] unexpected plot behavior

2012-04-21 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 21.04.2012 16:49, Martin Renner wrote: When plotting a numerical vector against a factor, 'type="n"' seems to have no affect, e.g. plot (1:10~factor (1:10), type = "n") looks just like plot (1:10~factor (1:10)) This plots 10 boxplots and the data are passed from plot.formula. plot.fo

Re: [R] unexpected plot behavior

2012-04-21 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Apr 21, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Martin Renner wrote: > When plotting a numerical vector against a factor, 'type="n"' seems to have > no affect, e.g. >> plot (1:10~factor (1:10), type = "n") > > looks just like >> plot (1:10~factor (1:10)) > > Plotting a numerical against itself works as expected:

[R] unexpected plot behavior

2012-04-21 Thread Martin Renner
When plotting a numerical vector against a factor, 'type="n"' seems to have no affect, e.g. > plot (1:10~factor (1:10), type = "n") looks just like > plot (1:10~factor (1:10)) Plotting a numerical against itself works as expected: > plot (1:10, type = "n") I see the same behavior under debian