Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero

2013-02-08 Thread Morway, Eric
useRs, Using a code suggestion from the previous post in this thread (quoted next), I was able to work through a smaller example problem and get some results I was aiming for. >That might not construct the bands in the blocks correctly: This might >be better: > >MAT [ kronecker( matrix(1, 4,4), a

Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero

2013-01-23 Thread David Winsemius
On Jan 23, 2013, at 5:31 PM, David Winsemius wrote: On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:13 AM, emorway wrote: The following 1460 x 1460 matrix can be throught of as 16 distinct 365 x 365 matrices. I'm trying to set off-diaganol terms in the 16 sub- matrices with indices more than +/- 5 (days) from each

Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero

2013-01-23 Thread Berend Hasselman
On 24-01-2013, at 01:58, emorway wrote: > I'm not following. Printing SEQ to the screen at the intermediate steps > using the following modified R code suggests that 'i' is fine and is not > getting reset to 1 as you suggest? You misread. I did not say anything about 'i'. > My understanding,

Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero

2013-01-23 Thread arun
737 738 739 740 741 # [1] 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 #[1] 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 #[1] 738 739 740 741 A.K. - Original Message - From: emorway To: r-help@r-project.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:58 PM Subject: Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero

Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero

2013-01-23 Thread Daniel Nordlund
> -Original Message- > From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] > On Behalf Of emorway > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 4:59 PM > To: r-help@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero > > I'm not following

Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero

2013-01-23 Thread David Winsemius
On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:13 AM, emorway wrote: > The following 1460 x 1460 matrix can be throught of as 16 distinct 365 x 365 > matrices. I'm trying to set off-diaganol terms in the 16 sub-matrices with > indices more than +/- 5 (days) from each other to zero using some for loops. > This works wel

Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero

2013-01-23 Thread emorway
I'm not following. Printing SEQ to the screen at the intermediate steps using the following modified R code suggests that 'i' is fine and is not getting reset to 1 as you suggest? My understanding, or rather my desired output if someone else is able to weight-in, is that the values in the second

Re: [R] setting off-diagonals to zero

2013-01-23 Thread Berend Hasselman
On 23-01-2013, at 16:13, emorway wrote: > The following 1460 x 1460 matrix can be throught of as 16 distinct 365 x 365 > matrices. I'm trying to set off-diaganol terms in the 16 sub-matrices with > indices more than +/- 5 (days) from each other to zero using some for loops. > This works well f

[R] setting off-diagonals to zero

2013-01-23 Thread emorway
The following 1460 x 1460 matrix can be throught of as 16 distinct 365 x 365 matrices. I'm trying to set off-diaganol terms in the 16 sub-matrices with indices more than +/- 5 (days) from each other to zero using some for loops. This works well for some, but not all, of the for loops. The R code