On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
power.prop.test (sic) is relying heavily on asymptotic normality, as do similar
formulas. It doesn't use continuity correction, but if you're working with such
small group sizes, I suspect that the correction term is the least of your
worries and tha
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Daniel Brewer wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to sort out a discrepancy between power calculations results
between me and another statistician. I use R but I am not sure what she
uses. It is on the proportions test and so I have been using
pwr.prop.test. I think I have tracked t
Daniel Brewer wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to sort out a discrepancy between power calculations results
between me and another statistician. I use R but I am not sure what she
uses. It is on the proportions test and so I have been using
pwr.prop.test. I think I have tracked the problem down to pwr.
Hi,
I am trying to sort out a discrepancy between power calculations results
between me and another statistician. I use R but I am not sure what she
uses. It is on the proportions test and so I have been using
pwr.prop.test. I think I have tracked the problem down to pwr.prop.test
not using the
4 matches
Mail list logo
