> The graphics devices are very similar (they share a lot of code). One
> small difference is that PostScript has an arc primitive, and PDF does
> not.
>
Sorry for interjecting, but I have a burning question. It is a bit off
topic, so I apologize in advance.
What is the stance of the R Develo
have not followed the thread completely, but:
have you tried `bitmap' with `type = pdfwrite' (or psgrb)
for comparison? at least with `pdf' there are some issues which
can be avoided by using ghostscript via `bitmap'.
joerg
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:17:50PM -0400, Francois Pepin wrote:
> Prof B
On Monday 31 March 2008 10:17:50 pm Francois Pepin wrote:
FP> Example of row names that are truncated in Illustrator (* denoting
FP> truncation):
FP> CCDC3*4 (2nd row)
FP> MUC2*0 (3rd row)
FP> MBNL*1 (8th row)
Those are not truncated with me but there are some truncated, this is true.
Note that
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Please see the footer of this message.
Sorry, here is an example. For some reason, I cannot reproduce it
without using actual gene names.
set.seed(1)
##The row names were originally obtained using the hgug4112a library
##from bioconductor. I set it manually for peop
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Francois Pepin wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been making a fair amount of figures in R recently that I've
> been touching up with Illustrator and I've found a difference between
> pdf and ps files and I was wondering if someone could enlighten me
> about them.
>
> While the
Hi everyone,
I have been making a fair amount of figures in R recently that I've
been touching up with Illustrator and I've found a difference between
pdf and ps files and I was wondering if someone could enlighten me
about them.
While the figures look the same, the ps version tends to have
trunc
6 matches
Mail list logo