On 07/07/10 18:52, Paul Johnson wrote:
> [...]
> 1:
> axis(1, line=6, at=mu+dividers*sigma,
> labels=as.expression(c(b1,b2,b3,b4,b5), padj=-1))
>
>
> 2:
> axis(1, line=9, at=mu+dividers*sigma,
> labels=c(as.expression(b1),b2,b3,b4,b5), padj=-1)
>
> This second one shouldn't work, I think.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>
>>> You want "as.expression(b1)", not "expression(b1)". The latter means
>>> "the
>>> expression consisting of the symbol b1". The former means "take the
>>> object
>>> stored in b1, and convert it to an expression.".
>>>
Thanks to
On 07/07/2010 1:03 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 06/07/2010 10:54 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Here's another example of my plotmath whipping boy, the Normal
distribution.
You want "as.expression(b1)", not "expression(b1)". The l
Ooops, I didn't convert this one to text right for the list.
b1<- substitute( mu - d*sigma, list(d=*-round(dividers[1],2))* )
should be
b1<- substitute( mu - d*sigma, list(d=-round(dividers[1],2)) )
and similarly for
labels=*as.expression(c(b1,b2,b3,b4,b5))*, padj=-1)
read
label
On 07/07/10 06:03, Paul Johnson wrote:
> [...]
> Hi, Duncan and David
>
> Thanks for looking. I suspect from the comment you did not run the
> code. The expression examples I give do work fine already. But I
> have to explicitly put in values like 1.96 to make them work. I'm
> trying to avid
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 10:54 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Here's another example of my plotmath whipping boy, the Normal
>> distribution.
>>
> You want "as.expression(b1)", not "expression(b1)". The latter means "the
> expression consisting of the
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010, David Winsemius wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 06/07/2010 10:54 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Here's another example of my plotmath whipping boy, the Normal
> distribution.
>
> A colleague asks for a Normal plotted above a series of axes that
>
On 06/07/10 18:51, David Winsemius wrote:
Easily addressed in this case with "~" instead of "-". The value of
"d" provides the minus:
b1 <- substitute( mu ~ d*sigma, list(d=round(dividers[1],2)) )
Neat trick! But it gives a slightly different minus sign in the
display, so perhaps simply
On Jul 6, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 06/07/2010 10:54 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Here's another example of my plotmath whipping boy, the Normal
distribution.
A colleague asks for a Normal plotted above a series of axes that
represent various other distributions (T, etc).
I wan
On 06/07/2010 10:54 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Here's another example of my plotmath whipping boy, the Normal distribution.
A colleague asks for a Normal plotted above a series of axes that
represent various other distributions (T, etc).
I want to use vectors of equations in plotmath to do this, b
Here's another example of my plotmath whipping boy, the Normal distribution.
A colleague asks for a Normal plotted above a series of axes that
represent various other distributions (T, etc).
I want to use vectors of equations in plotmath to do this, but have
run into trouble. Now I've isolated t
11 matches
Mail list logo
