宋时歌 a écrit :
> David,
>
> The value of odfWeave is not limited to newbie users. It is vastly
> useful for researchers in fields that do not accept LaTeX for journal
> paper submission (for example, sociology, demography).
... and for those of us living in the salt mines of administration (in
my
David,
The value of odfWeave is not limited to newbie users. It is vastly
useful for researchers in fields that do not accept LaTeX for journal
paper submission (for example, sociology, demography).
Best,
Shige
On Jan 17, 2008 5:46 PM, David Hajage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes, but we loose
yes, but we loose the possibility to use a 'simple' text editor. For
example, I like to use emacs+ess to edit and evaluate R code, and to write
my report in the same editor.
I like the idea that the input format could be writen with a simple text
editor, and the output format be chosen after. I kno
2008/1/16 David Hajage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ps : I would like to know if there is an R project to include all existing
> format outputs (latex with Sweave, odf with odfWeave, html with rWeaveHTML)
> and all the wonderful work of their author in a same package or in a same
> project. All of these
It is verry easy with xtable package to make your own "xtable.class"
function, if the "class" was not implemented in xtable package yet.
It would be wonderfull if odfWeave include a framework to make such things.
Ps : I would like to know if there is an R project to include all existing
format ou
Dear Max,
If you have plan to add more table making facilities into odfWeave
package, I suggest you base your work on Zelig, a R package that tries
to provide a unified interface to many existing R statistical
libraries, created by Gary King's team at Harvard. I see great
potential in this marriag
Thanks, Frank. The clarification as well as the referred resources are
extremely helpful.
Shige
On Jan 13, 2008 10:14 PM, Frank E Harrell Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 宋时歌 wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > I use Hmisc and Design in my research a lot, the LaTeX facilities are
> > very handy. But I do
宋时歌 wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> I use Hmisc and Design in my research a lot, the LaTeX facilities are
> very handy. But I don't think they can work with OpenOffice document
> format (ODF), or did I miss something?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Shige
You're correct. Conversion from LaTeX to OpenOffice or Word is
Hi Frank,
I use Hmisc and Design in my research a lot, the LaTeX facilities are
very handy. But I don't think they can work with OpenOffice document
format (ODF), or did I miss something?
Thanks.
Shige
On Jan 13, 2008 2:03 AM, Frank E Harrell Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ??? wrote:
> > Dea
Dear Max:
This is very helpful, thank you. By the way, nice work on odfWeave!
Best,
Shige
On Jan 13, 2008 4:09 AM, Max Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing on my (neglected) to-do list for odfWeave is to create a
> general class called odf that can be used to create output for common
> mo
One thing on my (neglected) to-do list for odfWeave is to create a
general class called odf that can be used to create output for common
models (lm, glm etc). The nice thing here is that the output from this
function could write mixed output. For example, a short paragraph
about the specified model
??? wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am new to odfWeave and was wondering if there are something similar
> to the xtable package that can automatically convert model
> coefficients into LaTeX/ODT tables? More generally, how do people who
> use odfWeave transform model results into tables? The odfTable do
Dear All,
I am new to odfWeave and was wondering if there are something similar
to the xtable package that can automatically convert model
coefficients into LaTeX/ODT tables? More generally, how do people who
use odfWeave transform model results into tables? The odfTable does
not seem to be able
13 matches
Mail list logo
