On 2010-07-09 13:29, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/07/2010 2:36 PM, Jim Bouldin wrote:
> 1. The expression you gave us is clearly not the one that produced
the > error: it involved "ring.area" and "ba.beg".
> > 2. You don't tell us what x and y are, so we can't reproduce
anything.
Sorry, I guess
On 09/07/2010 2:36 PM, Jim Bouldin wrote:
> 1. The expression you gave us is clearly not the one that produced the
> error: it involved "ring.area" and "ba.beg".
>
> 2. You don't tell us what x and y are, so we can't reproduce anything.
Sorry, I guess that was unclear. I changed the respon
> 1. The expression you gave us is clearly not the one that produced the
> error: it involved "ring.area" and "ba.beg".
>
> 2. You don't tell us what x and y are, so we can't reproduce anything.
Sorry, I guess that was unclear. I changed the response and independent
variable names to y and
On 09/07/2010 1:51 PM, Jim Bouldin wrote:
I am trying to perform an nls for a valid negative exponential function:
zz=nls(y~constant+a.est*2.7183^(b.est*x),start=list(constant=4.0,a.est=-4,b.est
= -.005),trace=T)
and am getting a number of different error messages, the most problematic
of whic
I am trying to perform an nls for a valid negative exponential function:
zz=nls(y~constant+a.est*2.7183^(b.est*x),start=list(constant=4.0,a.est=-4,b.est
= -.005),trace=T)
and am getting a number of different error messages, the most problematic
of which is "Error in nls(ring.area ~ constant + a
5 matches
Mail list logo
