Re: [R] mgcv bam() with grouped binomial data

2012-02-02 Thread Simon Wood
d is causing the error. Do you have any ideas on what might be happening? I recognize it is hard to know without seeing the data Thanks again Casey -Original Message- From: Simon Wood [mailto:s.w...@bath.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:17 AM To: Casey Olives Cc: 'r-h

Re: [R] mgcv bam() with grouped binomial data

2012-02-01 Thread Casey Olives
or. Do you have any ideas on what might be happening? I recognize it is hard to know without seeing the data Thanks again Casey -Original Message- From: Simon Wood [mailto:s.w...@bath.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:17 AM To: Casey Olives Cc: 'r-help@r-project.org'

Re: [R] mgcv bam() with grouped binomial data

2012-01-31 Thread Simon Wood
upgrade to the current mgcv version (see last item in changeLog for mgcv 1.7-12) On 01/30/2012 10:04 PM, Casey Olives wrote: Hello, I'm trying to use the bam() function in the R mgcv package for a large set of grouped binary data. However, I have found that this function does not take data i

[R] mgcv bam() with grouped binomial data

2012-01-30 Thread Casey Olives
Hello, I'm trying to use the bam() function in the R mgcv package for a large set of grouped binary data. However, I have found that this function does not take data in the format of cbind(numerator, denominator) on the left hand side of the formula. As an example, consider the following dat1