@ Micheal: thanks I understand now.
@ Wolfgang: apparently, using the DL-estimator solved my issue and
leaded to a result with only a slight difference with metawin. thanks
!
2012/1/17 Michael Dewey :
> At 12:15 16/01/2012, Ricc wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I used the default parameters:
>> - envelope:
At 12:15 16/01/2012, Ricc wrote:
Hello,
I used the default parameters:
- envelope: default is TRUE
- level: the default is to take the value from the object (I do not
understand this very well)
When you specified your original model to rma.uni you either
specified the level or let it default (
ehalf Of
Ricc [alltheweb2cc+rh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 1:15 PM
To: Michael Dewey
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] meta-analysis normal quantile plot metafor
Hello,
I used the default parameters:
- envelope: default is TRUE
- level: the default is to take the value from
Hello,
I used the default parameters:
- envelope: default is TRUE
- level: the default is to take the value from the object (I do not
understand this very well)
- bonferroni : no
- reps : default is 1000
- smooth: default is TRUE
- bass : default is 0
I used no other arguments.
2012/1/13 Michae
At 15:53 11/01/2012, Ricc wrote:
Hello,
I once used the metawin software to perform a meta-analysis (see
metawinsoft, Rosenberg et al.) and produced normal qqplot to test for
a potential bias in the dataset.
I now want to re-use the same dataset with the package metafor by W.
Viechtbauer (great
Hello,
I once used the metawin software to perform a meta-analysis (see
metawinsoft, Rosenberg et al.) and produced normal qqplot to test for
a potential bias in the dataset.
I now want to re-use the same dataset with the package metafor by W.
Viechtbauer (great package btw).
I run the qqnorm.rma
6 matches
Mail list logo
