Re: [R] lmer and method call

2007-12-01 Thread Douglas Bates
On Dec 1, 2007 10:08 AM, Dieter Menne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Douglas Bates stat.wisc.edu> writes: > > (lmer) > > > The default is PQL, to refine the > > starting estimates, followed by optimization of the Laplace > > approximation. In some cases it is an advantage to suppress the PQL > > it

Re: [R] lmer and method call

2007-12-01 Thread Dieter Menne
Douglas Bates stat.wisc.edu> writes: (lmer) > The default is PQL, to refine the > starting estimates, followed by optimization of the Laplace > approximation. In some cases it is an advantage to suppress the PQL > iterations which can be done with one of the settings for the control > argument.

Re: [R] lmer and method call

2007-12-01 Thread Douglas Bates
On Dec 1, 2007 9:26 AM, Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 29, 2007 8:09 PM, M-J Milloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I'm attempting to fit a generalized linear mixed-effects model using lmer > > (R v 2.6.0, lmer 0.99875-9, Mac OS X 10.4.10) using the call: >

Re: [R] lmer and method call

2007-12-01 Thread Douglas Bates
On Nov 29, 2007 8:09 PM, M-J Milloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm attempting to fit a generalized linear mixed-effects model using lmer > (R v 2.6.0, lmer 0.99875-9, Mac OS X 10.4.10) using the call: > > vidusLMER1 <- lmer(jail ~ visit + gender + house + cokefreq + cracfreq + >

[R] lmer and method call

2007-11-30 Thread M-J Milloy
Hello all, I'm attempting to fit a generalized linear mixed-effects model using lmer (R v 2.6.0, lmer 0.99875-9, Mac OS X 10.4.10) using the call: vidusLMER1 <- lmer(jail ~ visit + gender + house + cokefreq + cracfreq + herofreq + borcur + comc + (1 | code), data = vidusGD, family = binomial, co