Re: [R] lme-post hoc

plsc wrote: > > > I analysed my data with lme and after that I spent a lot of time for > mean separation of treatments (post hoc). But still I couldn’t make > through it. This is my data set and R scripts I tried. > > > > 3 level3 var4361261 > > modela<-lme(height~varie

Re: [R] lme-post hoc

plsc wrote: > > > I analysed my data with lme and after that I spent a lot of time for > mean separation of treatments (post hoc). But still I couldn’t make > through it. This is my data set and R scripts I tried. > > > > 3 level3 var4361261 > > modela<-lme(height~varie

Re: [R] lme-post hoc

-- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/lme-post-hoc-tp3224436p3224652.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do re

[R] lme-post hoc

Hi all, I analysed my data with lme and after that I spent a lot of time for mean separation of treatments (post hoc). But still I couldn’t make through it. This is my data set and R scripts I tried. replication fertilizer variety plotheight 1 level1 var1150452 1