Fine !
Many many thanks!
Mario
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Bernd Weiss [mailto:bernd.we...@uni-koeln.de]
Inviato: venerdì 18 aprile 2014 15.58
A: petre...@unina.it; R-help@r-project.org
Oggetto: Re: [R] interpreting weight in meta-analysis of proportion
On 18.04.2014 13:02, petre
On 18.04.2014 13:02, petre...@unina.it wrote:
> Prof. Dewey, sorry for the trivial question and many thank for the replay.
>
>
>> Using which package?
>
> In this case I used the meta package, but I know that for all but the
> DerSimonian-Laird method the R function rma.uni of R package metafor
l Dewey
To: petre...@unina.it, r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] interpreting weight in meta-analysis of proportion
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 16:30 16/04/2014, petre...@unina.it wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I use R 3.0 for Windows.
At 16:30 16/04/2014, petre...@unina.it wrote:
Dear all,
I use R 3.0 for Windows.
I performed a meta-analysis of the prevalence (single proportion)
reported in 14 different studyes using the command:
res<-metaprop(case,n,sm="PFT", comb.fixed=FALSE, comb.random=TRUE,
studlab<- paste(Study))
Us
Dear all,
I use R 3.0 for Windows.
I performed a meta-analysis of the prevalence (single proportion)
reported in 14 different studyes using the command:
res<-metaprop(case,n,sm="PFT", comb.fixed=FALSE, comb.random=TRUE,
studlab<- paste(Study))
print(res)
A referee ask a brief explanatio
5 matches
Mail list logo