"9", "10"), az = c(0, 360, 57, 94, 96, 152, 182, 185, 227,
264, 332, 354), dist = c(0, 16, 4.09, 2.8, 7.08, 7.09, 3.28,
7.85, 6.12, 1.97, 7.68, 7.9)), .Names = c("oplt", "rplt",
"az", "dist"), row.names = c(NA, 12L), class = "dat
> Does the difference have something to do with ggplot() using ranges
> derived from the data?
> When I modify my original 'test' dataframe with two extra rows as
> defined below, I get expected results in both versions.
Order shouldn't matter - and if it's making a difference, that's a
bug. But
rg
>Subject: RE: [R] ggplot questions
>
>David,
>
>1. Try scale_x_continuous(lim = c(0, 360)) + scale_y_continuous(lim =
>c(0, 16))
>2. You could set the colour of the gridlines equal to the backgroup
>colour with ggopt
>
>HTH,
>
>Thierry
>
_
Thanx Hadley,
More questions inline.
>-Original Message-
>From: hadley wickham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: June 5, 2008 01:09 PM
>To: Thompson, David (MNR)
>Cc: r-help@r-project.org
>Subject: Re: [R] ggplot questions
>
>On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:03
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Thompson, David (MNR)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few questions about the following examples:
> 1. Why do the two plotting versions not produce the same result?
Because version one has two layers, and version two has one?
> 2. Is the 'scale_x_continuo
Hello,
A few questions about the following examples:
1. Why do the two plotting versions not produce the same result?
2. Is the 'scale_x_continuous' (or *_y_* or *_*_discrete) geom the best
way to setup grids (as in visual guide-lines) in polar (or for that
matter, any) coordinate system?
3. Why d
6 matches
Mail list logo