Megha Patnaik wrote:
> Great! You can navigate to choosing the resolution from the warning window.
>
will do. thanks for your help.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http
Great! You can navigate to choosing the resolution from the warning window.
2008/11/16 john polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> >> from xdpyinfo:
> >> screen #0:
> >> dimensions:1280x800 pixels (289x21 millimeters)
> >> resolution:112x968 dots per inch
> >
> > Ick!
> >
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>> from xdpyinfo:
>> screen #0:
>> dimensions:1280x800 pixels (289x21 millimeters)
>> resolution:112x968 dots per inch
>
> Ick!
>
> Yes that will do that to you.
>
> You might want to try putting
>
> DisplaySize 339 212
>
> in the Monitor section of xorg.conf
>
it
john polo wrote:
According to your setup, the system should believe that you have an
~8 inch screen (800/96) and >the default X11 window is 7x7 inches so
there _should_ be plenty of room, but some systems try >to outsmart
the user and use the actual physical dimensions, which could be
smaller (hi
My xorg.conf has "Configured Monitor" as opposed to "Generic Monitor". Here
is the relevant portion of my xorg.conf:
Section "Device"
Identifier"Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)"
Driver"intel"
EndSection
Section "Mo
megha patnaik wrote:
> Hi John,
> an R problem, but an X11 bug in Ubuntu. This is evident from
plot(rnorm(10))
> failing to perform. If you are seeing this, then it is because X11
does not
> automatically detect Intel graphic cards. The solution is to edit your
> xorg.conf file, changing it to some
Erik Iverson wrote:
You should begin by telling us what you did to produce the result. That
way we can tell if it's something in your R commands or not. If you
give us step by step instructions to reproduce the problem (with
simulated data, or a dataset distributed with R), it becomes much ea
The steps I carried out to detect where the problem was were as follows:
1. Checked whether basic plots in R worked
2. Created a new UID ( which did not have my saved settings in R) and tried
basic plots.
If 2. told me that margins were too large, then this was not a problem due
to my past command
Hi John,
I had struggled with this myself, and investigation revealed that it isn't
an R problem, but an X11 bug in Ubuntu. This is evident from plot(rnorm(10))
failing to perform. If you are seeing this, then it is because X11 does not
automatically detect Intel graphic cards. The solution is to
John -
john polo wrote:
Erik Iverson wrote:
You should begin by telling us what you did to produce the result.
That way we can tell if it's something in your R commands or not. If
you give us step by step instructions to reproduce the problem (with
simulated data, or a dataset distributed wit
Erik Iverson wrote:
> You should begin by telling us what you did to produce the result.
> That way we can tell if it's something in your R commands or not. If
> you give us step by step instructions to reproduce the problem (with
> simulated data, or a dataset distributed with R), it becomes muc
You should begin by telling us what you did to produce the result. That
way we can tell if it's something in your R commands or not. If you
give us step by step instructions to reproduce the problem (with
simulated data, or a dataset distributed with R), it becomes much easier
to debug.
In
greetings,
i'm trying plot() from Owen's _The R Guide_ and having trouble with
being able to view the result. the Graphics Device 2 draws an image i
can only see the top part of and when i try to manipulate the window to
see the image, the window then says: "...ure margins too lar..." in
large let
13 matches
Mail list logo
