t A LaBudde
To: array chip
Cc: Bert Gunter ; r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch
Sent: Thu, February 10, 2011 12:54:44 PM
Subject: Re: [R] comparing proportions
1. If you use a random effects model, you should
make Subject the random factor. I.e., a random
intercepts model with 1|Subject. Group is a
fixed effect: You have
nd the system of interest.
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:17:29 -0800
From: arrayprof...@yahoo.com
To: r...@lcfltd.com
CC: r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch; gunter.ber...@gene.com
Subject: Re: [R] comparing proportions
Robert, thank you!
I tried all 3 models you suggested. Since
e 0.15 to 0.85, so maybe
regular linear model may not be appropriate?
Thank you,
John
From: Robert A LaBudde
To: array chip
Cc: Bert Gunter ; r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch
Sent: Thu, February 10, 2011 12:54:44 PM
Subject: Re: [R] comparing proportions
1.
ted in. So do I really need a mixed model here?
Thanks again
John
From: Bert Gunter
To: Robert A LaBudde
Cc: array chip
Sent: Thu, February 10, 2011 10:04:06 AM
Subject: Re: [R] comparing proportions
Robert:
Yes, exactly. In an offlist email exchange, he clarified this for me,
and I suggest
ataset, or I may be wrong?
Thanks
John
From: Bert Gunter
Sent: Wed, February 9, 2011 3:58:05 PM
Subject: Re: [R] comparing proportions
1. Is this a homework problem?
2. ?prop.test
3. If you haven't done so already, get and consult a basic statis
here when the response variable is actually proportions.
I guess prop.test() can not be used with my dataset, or I may be wrong?
Thanks
John
From: Bert Gunter
Sent: Wed, February 9, 2011 3:58:05 PM
Subject: Re: [R] comparing proportions
1. Is t
Hi, I have a dataset that has 2 groups of samples. For each sample, then
response measured is the number of success (no.success) obatined with the
number
of trials (no.trials). So a porportion of success (prpop.success) can be
computed as no.success/no.trials. Now the objective is to test if th
Hi everyone,
I am trying to compare proportions among groups using the logistic
regression
approach as follows:
1) Fit the model log(p_i/(1-p_i)) = M + G_i, where p_i is the probability
of success in group i and G_i is the effect of group i, i=1,..,I.
2) Test the hypotheses:
Ho: G_1 = G_2 =
Okay, I will do that, thank you.
prop.test seems to work, too, someone wrote me?!
prop.test(x=c(40,100), n=c(200,300))
I tried it and it seems fine.. is it the same or is chisq.test better? I
will read a bit about chi-square tests now.. Thanks a lot,
Lila
Richard Cotton wrote:
>
>
> Lila86
Lila86 wrote:
>
> I have two groups (men and women) and I know per group how many of them
> smoke or don't smoke (women 40 of 200; men 100 of 300). I would like to
> know how I can compare in R if men and women differ significantly in their
> smoking. However, because there are more men in the
On 3/28/2008 5:33 AM, Lila86 wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have two groups (men and women) and I know per group how many of them
> smoke or don't smoke (women 40 of 200; men 100 of 300). I would like to know
> how I can compare in R if men and women differ significantly in their
> smoking. However,
Hello there,
I have two groups (men and women) and I know per group how many of them
smoke or don't smoke (women 40 of 200; men 100 of 300). I would like to know
how I can compare in R if men and women differ significantly in their
smoking. However, because there are more men in the sample than
12 matches
Mail list logo