oops, I just realised that the fix referred to below is in mgcv 1.8-3 -
not yet on CRAN.
On 25/08/14 13:20, Simon Wood wrote:
Hi Andrew,
In some of the shots you sent then top was reporting several cores
working. I think the problem here may be to do with the way bam is
parallelized - at prese
Hi Andrew,
In some of the shots you sent then top was reporting several cores
working. I think the problem here may be to do with the way bam is
parallelized - at present only part of the computation is in parallel -
the model matrix QR decomposition part. The smoothing parameter
selection is
Hi Simon,
(resending with all images as imgur so as to not bounce from list)
Thanks for the reply. I've tried to reproduce the error, but I don't
know how to show output from `top` any other way than with screenshots,
so please excuse that.
Here are screenshots of what happens when I run wi
Hi Andrew,
Could you provide a bit more information, please. In particular the
results of sessionInfo() and the code that caused this weird behaviour
(+ an indication of dataset size).
best,
Simon
On 21/08/14 12:53, Andrew Crane-Droesch wrote:
I am getting strange behavior when trying to fi
I am getting strange behavior when trying to fit models to large
datasets using bam. I am working on a 4-core machine, but I think that
there may be 2 physical cores that the computer uses as 4 cores in some
sense that I don't understand.
When I run the bam using makeCluster(3), the model run
5 matches
Mail list logo
