Re: [R] alternative to ifelse

2013-06-21 Thread S Ellison
Once you have this matrix: mx <- cbind(x1, x2, x3, x4) > > x1 x2 x3 x4 > > [1,] 22 14 24 10 > > [2,] 27 12 1 2 > > [3,] 23 13 6 2 > > [4,] 27 6 21 2 > > [5,] 14 29 12 19 > > [6,] 5 14 11 29 > > [7,] 10 10 27 25 > > [8,] 16 29 28 10 > > [9,] 22 22 19 7 > > [10,] 30 20 5 22 > > [11,] 2

Re: [R] alternative to ifelse

2013-06-19 Thread arun
1,res2) #[1] TRUE  identical(res1,res3) #[1] TRUE identical(res1,res4) #[1] TRUE  identical(res1,res4New) #[1] TRUE A.K. - Original Message - From: Brian Perron To: r-help@r-project.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 9:24 AM Subject: [R] alternative to ifelse Greetings: I

Re: [R] alternative to ifelse

2013-06-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Jun 19, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Brian Perron wrote: > >> Greetings: >> >> I am looking for a way to avoid using the ifelse function for >> constructing a new variable. More specifically, assume I have a set >> of variables with scores rangi

Re: [R] alternative to ifelse

2013-06-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Jun 19, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Brian Perron wrote: > >> Greetings: >> >> I am looking for a way to avoid using the ifelse function for >> constructing a new variable. More specifically, assume I have a set >> of variables with scores rangi

Re: [R] alternative to ifelse

2013-06-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Brian Perron wrote: > Greetings: > > I am looking for a way to avoid using the ifelse function for > constructing a new variable. More specifically, assume I have a set > of variables with scores ranging from 1 to 30. > > set.seed(12345) > x <- c(1:30) > x1 <- sam

Re: [R] alternative to ifelse

2013-06-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Brian Perron wrote: > Greetings: > > I am looking for a way to avoid using the ifelse function for > constructing a new variable. More specifically, assume I have a set > of variables with scores ranging from 1 to 30. > > set.seed(12345) > x <- c(1:30) > x1 <- sam

Re: [R] alternative to ifelse

2013-06-19 Thread Enrico Schumann
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Brian Perron writes: > Greetings: > > I am looking for a way to avoid using the ifelse function for > constructing a new variable. More specifically, assume I have a set > of variables with scores ranging from 1 to 30. > > set.seed(12345) > x <- c(1:30) > x1 <- sample(x, 15,

Re: [R] alternative to ifelse

2013-06-19 Thread Richard M. Heiberger
as.numeric(x1 == 1 | x2 == 1 | x3 == 1 | x4 == 1) On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Brian Perron wrote: > Greetings: > > I am looking for a way to avoid using the ifelse function for > constructing a new variable. More specifically, assume I have a set > of variables with scores ranging from 1 t

[R] alternative to ifelse

2013-06-19 Thread Brian Perron
Greetings: I am looking for a way to avoid using the ifelse function for constructing a new variable. More specifically, assume I have a set of variables with scores ranging from 1 to 30. set.seed(12345) x <- c(1:30) x1 <- sample(x, 15, replace = TRUE) x2 <- sample(x, 15, replace = TRUE) x3 <- s