Re: [R] adding a function after package.skeleton()

2008-01-03 Thread Gavin Simpson
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:47 +, Gavin Simpson wrote: > On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 20:28 +, baptiste Auguié wrote: > > Hi, > Is Constants supposed to be fixed and unchanging? If yes, why hold these > in a data object? One option might be to have a function Constants() in > your package, such th

Re: [R] adding a function after package.skeleton()

2008-01-03 Thread Gavin Simpson
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 20:28 +, baptiste Auguié wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for this tip, I'm always amazed at the number of clever > functions built-in in R –– just wish i could think of their name > rather than reinventing the wheel. > > However, I'm still stupidly stuck with this basic ques

Re: [R] adding a function after package.skeleton()

2007-12-30 Thread baptiste Auguié
Hi, Thanks for this tip, I'm always amazed at the number of clever functions built-in in R –– just wish i could think of their name rather than reinventing the wheel. However, I'm still stupidly stuck with this basic question: how should a function access data in its own package? On 30 De

Re: [R] adding a function after package.skeleton()

2007-12-30 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Dec 30, 2007 1:19 PM, baptiste Auguié <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These two functions use the dataframe "Constants", part of this package: > > > `L2eV` <- function(lambda) > > { > > data("Constants") > > Constants$h*Constants$cel/Constants$ee/lambda ->eV > > eV > > } >

[R] adding a function after package.skeleton()

2007-12-30 Thread baptiste Auguié
Dear R helpers, I've successfully created a package 'constants' using package.skeleton () with one dataframe and a few functions. However, now that I want to add some functions and data to the package, I run into a problem. I ran prompt(...) and moved + edited the resulting .Rd files as appr