it fails sooner.
Uwe Ligges
On 17.08.2011 19:57, Nordlund, Dan (DSHS/RDA) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: istaz...@gmail.com [mailto:istaz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Ista
Zahn
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 10:12 AM
To: Nordlund, Dan (DSHS/RDA)
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re:
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 11:14 AM
> To: Nordlund, Dan (DSHS/RDA)
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] Using require() vs. library()
>
> Actually require() is a wrapp
[mailto:istaz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Ista
Zahn
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 10:12 AM
To: Nordlund, Dan (DSHS/RDA)
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Using require() vs. library()
Hi Dan,
Is there something you would like to know that is not covered by
help(library) ?
Best,
Ista
On
> -Original Message-
> From: istaz...@gmail.com [mailto:istaz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Ista
> Zahn
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 10:12 AM
> To: Nordlund, Dan (DSHS/RDA)
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] Using require() vs. library()
>
> Hi Da
Hi Dan,
Is there something you would like to know that is not covered by help(library) ?
Best,
Ista
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Nordlund, Dan (DSHS/RDA)
wrote:
> A recent post prompts me to ask this question. Is there any reason to prefer
> using library() over require()? I tend to use
A recent post prompts me to ask this question. Is there any reason to prefer
using library() over require()? I tend to use require() instead of library()
to load packages, but I wonder if there are situations where it would be better
to use library().
Enquiring minds would like to know,
Da
6 matches
Mail list logo