Don, that was great - thanks so much!
...and you are right rbind() being expensive, but my dataframe will always
stay that small (max. twice as large).
Chaehan
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Don MacQueen wrote:
> You have a mistake in how you're setting up the object named "result"
> before t
You have a mistake in how you're setting up the object named "result"
before the loop.
You set result <- latentVariableNames. It is a vector of length 6,
when you call the function with LV. The printout from the first
iteration shows this.
But then you rbind result with a data frame that has
Ok, you're right - may I rephrase:
How should I modify the assignment of result <- latentVariableNames
so it produces the output without the first line?
I thought result <- NULL should do the job, but it didn't because of the
following names(result) assignment (which I understand, but not how I
ca
It doing exactly what you asked it to do. You have the assignment:
result <- latentVariableNames
and then you print it out in the loop. What were you expecting?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Chaehan So wrote:
> Dear r-helpers,
>
> why do I get an output in the first iteration of the for-lo
Dear r-helpers,
why do I get an output in the first iteration of the for-loop
which contains the string values of the input vector,
and how can I avoid that?
Here's the output (only line 1 is wrong)
latentVariable Indiv Group
1 rPlanning rIterat rTDD
2 rPlanning0.79 0.84
3
5 matches
Mail list logo
