Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence with multiple factors

Michael, so you're suggesting that I should do: aux <- interaction( Topology, Drift, lambda) and then fligner.test(dT~aux) Is that correct? On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Michael Dewey aghmed.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: > At 16:03 17/09/2008, Javier Acuña wrote: >> >> Hi, I'm a new user of R. My back

Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence, with multiple factors

>Ben Bolker ufl.edu> writes: > >I would try > >fligner.test(dT ~ Topology:Drift:lambda) > >in response to: > >Javier Acuna gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so > please bear with me if this is a silly question. > > I'm trying to assess wheth

Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence with multiple factors

At 16:03 17/09/2008, Javier Acuña wrote: Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so please bear with me if this is a silly question. For future reference you might find ?interaction helpful as another tool in your box. I'm trying to assess whether the results of an

Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence with multiple factors

Javier Acuña gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so > please bear with me if this is a silly question. > > I'm trying to assess whether the results of an experiment satisfy the > hypothesis of homoscedasticity (my ultimate goal is to use ANOV

[R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence with multiple factors

Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so please bear with me if this is a silly question. I'm trying to assess whether the results of an experiment satisfy the hypothesis of homoscedasticity (my ultimate goal is to use ANOVA). The result of the experiment is mean delay