Re: [R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck

2009-04-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
Berwin A Turlach wrote: G'day Uwe, On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:43 +0200 Uwe Ligges wrote: you can also take a source package an run R CMD Rd2dvi --no-clean packageName on it and you will get a temporary directory with the TeX sources in it. Which is fine for manual processing and when don

Re: [R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck

2009-04-29 Thread Berwin A Turlach
G'day Uwe, On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:03:43 +0200 Uwe Ligges wrote: > you can also take a source package an run > > R CMD Rd2dvi --no-clean packageName > > on it and you will get a temporary directory with the TeX sources in > it. Which is fine for manual processing and when done once or twice, b

Re: [R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck

2009-04-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
Bendix, you can also take a source package an run R CMD Rd2dvi --no-clean packageName on it and you will get a temporary directory with the TeX sources in it. Best wishes, Uwe BXC (Bendix Carstensen) wrote: In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave the file f

Re: [R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck

2009-04-28 Thread Berwin A Turlach
G'day Bendix, On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:52:02 +0200 "BXC (Bendix Carstensen)" wrote: > In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave > the file foo-manual.tex in the folder foo.Rcheck. > > But as of 2.9.0 only foo-manual.pdf and foo-manual.log are there. > > Is this intentio

[R] The .tex version of the manual in foo.Rcheck

2009-04-27 Thread BXC (Bendix Carstensen)
In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave the file foo-manual.tex in the folder foo.Rcheck. But as of 2.9.0 only foo-manual.pdf and foo-manual.log are there. Is this intentional? Anyway it is inconvenient, because I would occasionally like to include the manual at the