Thanks.You are right. I have realized that the atv function returns
empty for negative arguments. I was not aware that this would affect how
sapply processes its result.
>
> Quoting bic...@math.usask.ca:
>
>> Here is are a few lines of my R session:
>>
>>> class(income)
>> [1] "integer"
>>>
Quoting bic...@math.usask.ca:
Here is are a few lines of my R session:
class(income)
[1] "integer"
class(sapply(1000*income-999,atv,sktaxb,sktax))
[1] "numeric"
class(sapply(1000*income-1001,atv,sktaxb,sktax))
[1] "list"
Although "income" is a numeric array, and sapply works as expecte
Can you create a reproducible example?
You don't show: income, atv, sktaxb, sktax
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:04 PM wrote:
> Here is are a few lines of my R session:
>
> > class(income)
> [1] "integer"
> > class(sapply(1000*income-999,atv,sktaxb,sktax))
> [1] "numeric"
> > class(sapply(1000*inc
Hi bickis,
Putting on my dark glasses and flailing about with a big white stick*,
I would suggest that you look at what "atv" actually produces from
those three objects. I wouldn't be surprised to find quite different
things.
Jim
* blind guess
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:04 PM wrote:
>
> Here is a
Here is are a few lines of my R session:
> class(income)
[1] "integer"
> class(sapply(1000*income-999,atv,sktaxb,sktax))
[1] "numeric"
> class(sapply(1000*income-1001,atv,sktaxb,sktax))
[1] "list"
Although "income" is a numeric array, and sapply works as expected
returning an array (the function
5 matches
Mail list logo
