Re: [R] Stata/Rstudio evil attributes

2021-04-10 Thread William Michels via R-help
gt; capitalist > >> running dogs they are. Admittedly, the error is probably due to some > >> unforeseen > > > > This kind of bashing is really silly. Can you tell us again how much you > > paid for the use of the haven package? > > > > Best, >

Re: [R] Stata/Rstudio evil attributes

2021-04-10 Thread Koenker, Roger W
us again how much you paid > for the use of the haven package? > > Best, > Wolfgang > >> -----Original Message- >> From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Koenker, >> Roger W >> Sent: Saturday, 10 April, 2021 11:26 >>

Re: [R] Stata/Rstudio evil attributes

2021-04-10 Thread Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
paid for the use of the haven package? Best, Wolfgang >-Original Message- >From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Koenker, Roger >W >Sent: Saturday, 10 April, 2021 11:26 >To: r-help >Subject: [R] Stata/Rstudio evil attributes > >As shown in

[R] Stata/Rstudio evil attributes

2021-04-10 Thread Koenker, Roger W
As shown in the reproducible example below, I used the RStudio function haven() to read a Stata .dta file, and then tried to do some fitting with the resulting data.frame. This produced an error from my fitting function rqss() in the package quantreg. After a bit of frustrated cursing, I conve