Re: [R] Second-order effect in Parametric Survival Analysis

2011-11-13 Thread David Winsemius
On Nov 13, 2011, at 12:51 AM, ryusuke wrote: Thank you Dr. David. I try to summarize it. Assumes x and z are two covariates: x = dummy variable (1 or 0) z = factors (people name) x*z = x + z + x*z Actually I said = x + z + x:z And interaction formula of a two level dummy with a multi-level

Re: [R] Second-order effect in Parametric Survival Analysis

2011-11-12 Thread ryusuke
Thank you Dr. David. I try to summarize it. Assumes x and z are two covariates: x = dummy variable (1 or 0) z = factors (people name) x*z = x + z + x*z therefore this is not a 2nd-order interactions, it should be (for an exponential survival regression):- h(t|(X=x,Z=z)) = exp(Beta0 + XZBeta1) #-

Re: [R] Second-order effect in Parametric Survival Analysis

2011-11-12 Thread David Winsemius
On Nov 12, 2011, at 7:37 AM, ryusuke wrote: Hi experts, http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4034318/Parametric_survival_analysis_2nd-order_efffect.JPG Parametric_survival_analysis_2nd-order_efffect.JPG As we know a normal survival regression is the equation (1) Well, I'ld like to modify it to

[R] Second-order effect in Parametric Survival Analysis

2011-11-12 Thread ryusuke
Hi experts, http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4034318/Parametric_survival_analysis_2nd-order_efffect.JPG Parametric_survival_analysis_2nd-order_efffect.JPG As we know a normal survival regression is the equation (1) Well, I'ld like to modify it to be 2nd-order interaction model as shown in equa