Thank you!
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Simon Zehnder wrote:
> This depends very often of on the developer and what he is comfortable
> with. I like S4 classes, as I come from C++ and S4 classes approximate C++
> classes at least more than S3 classes do (Reference Classes would do so
> even
On 11/09/2013 11:59 AM, Rolf Turner wrote:
For my take on the issue see fortune("strait jacket").
cheers,
Rolf Turner
P. S. I said that quite some time ago and I have seen nothing
in the intervening years to change my views.
Mileage varies; the Bioconductor project attains a lev
For my take on the issue see fortune("strait jacket").
cheers,
Rolf Turner
P. S. I said that quite some time ago and I have seen nothing
in the intervening years to change my views.
R. T.
On 11/10/13 04:22, daniel schnaider wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a new credit portfolio o
This depends very often of on the developer and what he is comfortable with. I
like S4 classes, as I come from C++ and S4 classes approximate C++ classes at
least more than S3 classes do (Reference Classes would do so even more and I
know very good R programmers liking these most).
1) I wrote a
Hi,
I am working on a new credit portfolio optimization package. My question is
if it is more recommended to develop in S4 object oriented or S3.
It would be more naturally to develop in object oriented paradigm, but
there is many concerns regarding S4.
1) Performance of S4 could be an issue as
5 matches
Mail list logo
