That doesn't change the fact that the maximum is still 10.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:40 PM, pragathichi wrote:
>
> Sorry i made a mistake in the example my Quadradic constraint is
> X3^2-3.6 * X3 >= 0
>
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>
>> The 2nd constraint holds trivially and the 1st constraint i
Sorry i made a mistake in the example my Quadradic constraint is
X3^2-3.6 * X3 >= 0
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>
> The 2nd constraint holds trivially and the 1st constraint implies that the
> maximum is 10. The solution is not unique and any values of the
> variables satisfying the 1st constrai
The 2nd constraint holds trivially and the 1st constraint implies that the
maximum is 10. The solution is not unique and any values of the
variables satisfying the 1st constraint are optimum. No software
needed.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:19 AM, pragathichi wrote:
>
> Can someone suggest which p
Can someone suggest which package is required for optimization of linear
program with quadradic constraint.
Eg max x1+x2+x3
subject to
x1+x2+x3=10
x3^2 >= 0
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Quadradic-constraint-in-optimization-of-linear-program-tp25487057p25487057.html
Sen
4 matches
Mail list logo