Ok.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 12-03-11 4:30 PM, Eduardo Mendes wrote:
>
>> Dear Prof. Ripley
>>
>> Many thanks. rtools 2.15 did the job.
>>
>> One note if I may - In the rtools site one reads
>>
>> rtools215.exe - r>2.14.1 to R 2.15.x No
>> rtoosl214.exe - r 2.13
On 12-03-11 4:30 PM, Eduardo Mendes wrote:
Dear Prof. Ripley
Many thanks. rtools 2.15 did the job.
One note if I may - In the rtools site one reads
rtools215.exe - r>2.14.1 to R 2.15.x No
rtoosl214.exe - r 2.13.x or R.2.14.x yes
which can mislead the reader. 2.14.x could mean 2.14.2
But as
Dear Prof. Ripley
Many thanks. rtools 2.15 did the job.
One note if I may - In the rtools site one reads
rtools215.exe - r>2.14.1 to R 2.15.x No
rtoosl214.exe - r 2.13.x or R.2.14.x yes
which can mislead the reader. 2.14.x could mean 2.14.2 and "no" could mean
that rtools-2.15 is not read for
On 11/03/2012 19:43, Eduardo Mendes wrote:
Hello
I have recently installed R 2.14.2 on a brand new pc running Windows 64.
One of things I would like to do is to recompile my R package (with C and
fortran source codes) for this new environment (it works on a mac and on a
linux box). To this end,
Hello
I have recently installed R 2.14.2 on a brand new pc running Windows 64.
One of things I would like to do is to recompile my R package (with C and
fortran source codes) for this new environment (it works on a mac and on a
linux box). To this end, I had rtools 2.14 downloaded and installed (
5 matches
Mail list logo