Re: [R] Problem about zero

2010-06-15 Thread Jorge Ivan Velez
Same for me on Mac OS X: > x <- c(0.1819711,0.4811463,0.1935151,0.1433675) > 1-sum(x) [1] 0 > version$version.string [1] "R version 2.11.1 Patched (2010-05-31 r52180)" Regards, Jorge On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Gabor Grothendieck <> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Yen Lee <> wr

Re: [R] Problem about zero

2010-06-15 Thread Yen Lee
-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] Problem about zero On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Yen Lee wrote: > Hello, everyone, > > There's a problem about zero in R and I really need your help. > > > > I have a vector shown as x=c(0.1819711,0.4811463,0.1935151,0.1433675)

Re: [R] Problem about zero

2010-06-15 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Yen Lee wrote: > Hello, everyone, > > There's a problem about zero in R and I really need your help. > > > > I have a vector shown as x=c(0.1819711,0.4811463,0.1935151,0.1433675), > > The sum of this vector is shown as 1 in R, but when I type 1-sum(x), the > value

Re: [R] Problem about zero

2010-06-15 Thread Joshua Wiley
Hello Yen, You may find ?zapsmall helpful. If your algorithm expects 1-sum(x) to have a lower bound of zero, then also simply setting a cutoff point seems reasonable. Josh On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Yen Lee wrote: > Hello, everyone, > > There's a problem about zero in R and I really need

Re: [R] Problem about zero

2010-06-15 Thread Jorge Ivan Velez
Hi Yen, See http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#Why-doesn_0027t-R-think-these-numbers-are-equal_003f HTH, Jorge On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Yen Lee <> wrote: > Hello, everyone, > > There's a problem about zero in R and I really need your help. > > > > I have a vector shown as x=c

[R] Problem about zero

2010-06-15 Thread Yen Lee
Hello, everyone, There's a problem about zero in R and I really need your help. I have a vector shown as x=c(0.1819711,0.4811463,0.1935151,0.1433675), The sum of this vector is shown as 1 in R, but when I type 1-sum(x), the value is not zero, but -2.220446e-16. I can accept that this value i