On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, Andrea Altomani wrote:
Thanks for the very detailed explanation.
I did not create the series using structure(), that was the result of dump()
on an intermediate object created within tsdisagg::ta(),
There is no tsdisagg package on CRAN, just tsdisagg2. But this does not
ha
Thanks for the very detailed explanation.
I did not create the series using structure(), that was the result of
dump() on an intermediate object created within tsdisagg::ta(), which is
where I found the error in the first place. ta() indeed manipulates .Tsp
directly, rather than using ts. I guess
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Andrea Altomani wrote:
I should have formulated my question in a more specific way.
1. I suspect this is a floating point precision issue. I am not very
knowledgeable about R internals, can someone else confirm it?
Yes. If you represent a series with increment 1/12 it dep
I should have formulated my question in a more specific way.
1. I suspect this is a floating point precision issue. I am not very
knowledgeable about R internals, can someone else confirm it?
2. Should this be considered a bug or not, because it is "just a precision
issue"? Should I report it?
3
You already know the answer. Why ask?
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On September 1, 2017 7:23:24 AM PDT, Andrea Altomani
wrote:
>I have a time series x, and two other series obtained from it:
>
>x <- structure(2017, .Tsp = c(2017.417, 2017.417, 12),
>class =
I have a time series x, and two other series obtained from it:
x <- structure(2017, .Tsp = c(2017.417, 2017.417, 12),
class = "ts")
y <- floor(x)
z <- x-y
I would expect the three series to have exactly the same index.
However I get the following
> time(x)-time(y)
Jun
2017
6 matches
Mail list logo
