Re: [R] Package build and install under Windows

2010-09-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 15.09.2010 17:06, Tao wrote: Thanks. It seems that both Rtools210.exe and Rtools211.exe support R 1.10.x, which one is better for R 2.10.1. You can use both, but you may want to choose the newer one. Uwe __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list ht

Re: [R] Package build and install under Windows

2010-09-15 Thread Tao
Thanks. It seems that both Rtools210.exe and Rtools211.exe support R 1.10.x, which one is better for R 2.10.1. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Package-build-and-install-under-Windows-tp2539509p2540713.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [R] Package build and install under Windows

2010-09-15 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Tao wrote: Any other method besides using RTOOLS? I am using R 2.10.1, which version of Rtools should I use? It seems that there are two versions on the website. What website are you talking about? The Rtools website http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ has 7 different versions of th

Re: [R] Package build and install under Windows

2010-09-15 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 14.09.2010 21:05, Tao wrote: Any other method besides using RTOOLS? I am using R 2.10.1, which version of Rtools should I use? The most recent one that supports R-2.10.1? According to the webpage this is Rtools211.exe. > It seems that there are two versions on the website. The command

[R] Package build and install under Windows

2010-09-14 Thread Tao
Any other method besides using RTOOLS? I am using R 2.10.1, which version of Rtools should I use? It seems that there are two versions on the website. The commands like R CMD build should be used in the CMD window, right? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Pac