yet,
> although I can't remember bugs in this function since a very long time.
> Thx for feedback
> Best,
> G.
> --
> *Da:* Ruben de Bliek [mailto:rubendebl...@gmail.com]
> *Inviato:* venerdì 27 aprile 2012 16.28
> *A:* Millo Giovanni
> *
Da: Ruben de Bliek [mailto:rubendebl...@gmail.com]
Inviato: venerdì 27 aprile 2012 16.28
A: Millo Giovanni
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Oggetto: Re: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior
Thank you Millo. I was a little confused by the random versus pooling
nomenclature used in PLM, thank you
GLS", then you should use 'plm(yourformula, yourdata,
> model="random")' instead, and you'll get the standard RE model.
>
> Best wishes,
> Giovanni
>
> Giovanni Millo, PhD
> Research Dept.,
> Assicurazioni Generali SpA
> Via Machiavelli 4,
> 34132 Trieste (Italy)
uot;, then you should use 'plm(yourformula, yourdata,
model="random")' instead, and you'll get the standard RE model.
Best wishes,
Giovanni
Giovanni Millo, PhD
Research Dept.,
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
Via Machiavelli 4,
34132 Trieste (Italy)
tel. +39 040 671184
fax +39 040 671160
--
When using the PLM package (version 1.2-8), I encounter the probem that
calling the FGLS estimator evokes strange behavior, when choosing the
"random" effects model. After calling the PGGLS function to estimate FGLS,
PLM gives me a warning, stating that the "random" model has been replaced
with the
5 matches
Mail list logo