Re: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-27 Thread Ruben de Bliek
yet, > although I can't remember bugs in this function since a very long time. > Thx for feedback > Best, > G. > -- > *Da:* Ruben de Bliek [mailto:rubendebl...@gmail.com] > *Inviato:* venerdì 27 aprile 2012 16.28 > *A:* Millo Giovanni > *

[R] R: PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-27 Thread Millo Giovanni
Da: Ruben de Bliek [mailto:rubendebl...@gmail.com] Inviato: venerdì 27 aprile 2012 16.28 A: Millo Giovanni Cc: r-help@r-project.org Oggetto: Re: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior Thank you Millo. I was a little confused by the random versus pooling nomenclature used in PLM, thank you

Re: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-27 Thread Ruben de Bliek
GLS", then you should use 'plm(yourformula, yourdata, > model="random")' instead, and you'll get the standard RE model. > > Best wishes, > Giovanni > > Giovanni Millo, PhD > Research Dept., > Assicurazioni Generali SpA > Via Machiavelli 4, > 34132 Trieste (Italy)

[R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-27 Thread Millo Giovanni
uot;, then you should use 'plm(yourformula, yourdata, model="random")' instead, and you'll get the standard RE model. Best wishes, Giovanni Giovanni Millo, PhD Research Dept., Assicurazioni Generali SpA Via Machiavelli 4, 34132 Trieste (Italy) tel. +39 040 671184 fax +39 040 671160 --

[R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-26 Thread Ruben de Bliek
When using the PLM package (version 1.2-8), I encounter the probem that calling the FGLS estimator evokes strange behavior, when choosing the "random" effects model. After calling the PGGLS function to estimate FGLS, PLM gives me a warning, stating that the "random" model has been replaced with the