To heck with print(), use R's debugging capabilities instead:
trace ( minBMI, browser )
Be sure to ?trace and ?browser so you can figure out how to
interactively debug.
Eric
On 12/31/09 6:29 AM, John Sorkin wrote:
I have written a function that contains runs
lm()
vif() and
glm()
When th
> -Original Message-
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of John Sorkin
> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 6:30 AM
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] Obtaining partial output from a function that
> does
John Sorkin wrote:
Duncan,
Thank you, however, if you will look at my function (bottom of this Email
message), you will see that I have used print(). It appears that the print
function is not run until the entire function completes running.
No, statements are run in the order you give them
Duncan,
Thank you, however, if you will look at my function (bottom of this Email
message), you will see that I have used print(). It appears that the print
function is not run until the entire function completes running.
John
John David Sorkin M.D., Ph.D.
Chief, Biostatistics and Informatics
On Dec 31, 2009, at 8:29 AM, John Sorkin wrote:
I have written a function that contains runs
lm()
vif() and
glm()
When the glm() blows up with an error message, I don't get the
output from either the lm() or vf() even thought neither lm() nor
vif() have any problems . How can I force the
On 31/12/2009 9:29 AM, John Sorkin wrote:
I have written a function that contains runs
lm()
vif() and
glm()
When the glm() blows up with an error message, I don't get the output from
either the lm() or vf() even thought neither lm() nor vif() have any problems .
How can I force the function
I have written a function that contains runs
lm()
vif() and
glm()
When the glm() blows up with an error message, I don't get the output from
either the lm() or vf() even thought neither lm() nor vif() have any problems .
How can I force the function to print sequential results rather than wait
7 matches
Mail list logo
