Thanks for helping Dunlap.
I just don't get why does the function bettarg() executes well if I
evaluate it (by hand) step-by step . nut for the same input values , if I
tried to execute bettarg() it will give me the error
Error in if (y <= accept.prob) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
A
You can do things like
while ( !is.nan( r <- randomFunction(x) )) {}
# r will be a non-NaN value of randomFunction(x) now
or
for(i in seq_len(1000)) {
if (!is.nan( r <- randomFunction(x))) {
break
}
if (i == 1000) {
stop("no good values of randomFuncti
Hi all,
I'm trying to write 2 functions(as a part of a larger code) to evaluate a
certain equation. The function is :
X= c (0.3893094 2.0962311 2.6007558 3.0761810 3.3246947 3.3917976
4.1981546 6.8826140 12.3128013 15.5588470)
R=c (0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1)
alpha.update=function(X, R, alpha.c
3 matches
Mail list logo