Re: [R] Must be a better way to collate sequenced data

2009-06-08 Thread Petr PIKAL
ns, and >Information Systems > DePaul University > (currently on leave at University College Dublin) > > http://josquin.cti.depaul.edu/~rburke/ > > "The universe is made of stories, not of atoms" - Muriel Rukeyser > > > > -Original Message- >

Re: [R] Must be a better way to collate sequenced data

2009-06-08 Thread Burke, Robin
ect.org Subject: Odp: [R] Must be a better way to collate sequenced data Hi nobody has your data and so your code is irreproducible. Here are only few comments augdata <<- as.data.frame(cbind(utime.atimes, utime.aperc)) data.frame(utime.atimes, utime.aperc) is enough. cbinding is rather

[R] Must be a better way to collate sequenced data

2009-06-07 Thread Burke, Robin
I have data that looks like this time_stamp (seconds) user_id The data is (partial) ordered by time - in that sometimes transactions occur at the same timestamp. The output I want is collated by transaction time on a per user basis, normalized by the maximum number of transactions per user, an