- Original Message -
From: avraham.ad...@guycarp.com
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:54 am
Subject: RE: [R] Matrix inversion-different answers from LAPACK and LINPACK
To: Ravi Varadhan
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Thank you. One question, though. In the case where I have closed form
> f
Subject
RE: [R] Matrix inversion-different
-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of avraham.ad...@guycarp.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 6:11 PM
To: Douglas Bates
Cc: dmba...@gmail.com; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Matrix inversion-different answers from LAPACK and LINPACK
I will be the first one to admit I may be doing s
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of avraham.ad...@guycarp.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 6:11 PM
To: Douglas Bates
Cc: dmba...@gmail.com; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Matrix
am.ad...@guycarp.com,
r-help@r-project.org
06/17/2009 05:55 Subject
PM Re: [R] Matrix inversion-different
answers fro
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Albyn Jones wrote:
> As you seem to be aware, the matrix is poorly conditioned:
>
>> kappa(PLLH,exact=TRUE)
> [1] 115868900869
>
> It might be worth your while to think about reparametrizing.
Also, if it is to be a variance-covariance matrix then it must be
positiv
As you seem to be aware, the matrix is poorly conditioned:
> kappa(PLLH,exact=TRUE)
[1] 115868900869
It might be worth your while to think about reparametrizing.
albyn
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:37:48AM -0400, avraham.ad...@guycarp.com wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I am trying to invert a matrix, and
Subject
RE: [R] Matrix inversion-different
answers from LAPACK a
PM cc
Subject
RE: [R] Matrix inversion-different
cc
Subject
RE: [R] Matrix inversion-different
alf Of avraham.ad...@guycarp.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:38 AM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] Matrix inversion-different answers from LAPACK and LINPACK
Hello.
I am trying to invert a matrix, and I am finding that I can get different
answers depending on whether I set LAPACK
17, 2009 11:38 AM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] Matrix inversion-different answers from LAPACK and LINPACK
Hello.
I am trying to invert a matrix, and I am finding that I can get different
answers depending on whether I set LAPACK true or false using "qr". I had
understood that LA
Hello.
I am trying to invert a matrix, and I am finding that I can get different
answers depending on whether I set LAPACK true or false using "qr". I had
understood that LAPACK is, in general more robust and faster than LINPACK,
so I am confused as to why I am getting what seems to be invalid an
13 matches
Mail list logo
