erest.
From: Michael Just [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:12 PM
To: Greg Snow; r-help
Subject: Re: [R] LM intercept
Greg,
I don't think the intercept is 0.
My response variable is number of individuals within habitat. My independent
var
el Just [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2008 8:49 PM
> *To:* Greg Snow
> *Cc:* Rolf Turner; r-help
>
> *Subject:* Re: [R] LM intercept
>
> Greg,
> I will not be using categorical variables. That sample code I provided was
> from lm help. All of my variable
Subject: Re: [R] LM intercept
Greg,
I will not be using categorical variables. That sample code I provided was from
lm help. All of my variables are real numbers. The no intercept model, testing
all means equal to zero, seems less informative then testing whether the means
are equal to each other, in
chael Just [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 2:59 PM
> To: Rolf Turner
> Cc: r-help
> Subject: Re: [R] LM intercept
>
> Great,
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Rolf Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> >
&
: Rolf Turner
Cc: r-help
Subject: Re: [R] LM intercept
Great,
Thanks,
Michael
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Rolf Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On 14/10/2008, at 9:42 AM, Michael Just wrote:
>
> What is the difference when including or not including the intercep
Michael Just wrote:
Great,
Thanks,
Michael
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Rolf Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
On 14/10/2008, at 9:42 AM, Michael Just wrote:
What is the difference when including or not including the intercept when
using lm()?
x.noint <- lm(weight ~ group - 1))# omittin
Great,
Thanks,
Michael
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Rolf Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On 14/10/2008, at 9:42 AM, Michael Just wrote:
>
> What is the difference when including or not including the intercept when
>> using lm()?
>>
>> x.noint <- lm(weight ~ group - 1))# omitting interce
On 14/10/2008, at 9:42 AM, Michael Just wrote:
What is the difference when including or not including the
intercept when
using lm()?
x.noint <- lm(weight ~ group - 1))# omitting intercept
x <- lm(weight ~ group))
This has nothing to do with forcing the intercept to 0, correct?
On the cont
What is the difference when including or not including the intercept when
using lm()?
x.noint <- lm(weight ~ group - 1))# omitting intercept
x <- lm(weight ~ group))
This has nothing to do with forcing the intercept to 0, correct?
Thank you kindly,
Michael
[[alternative HTML version del
9 matches
Mail list logo
