Re: [R] L-BFGS-B and parscale in optim()

2011-05-25 Thread Sebastian P. Luque
On Wed, 25 May 2011 19:33:24 -0500, "Sebastian P. Luque" wrote: > which shows me that the estimate for at least one parameter is outside > the bounds. I'll try to prepare a simplified example to reproduce. I got it, it turned out to be the ndeps being too large so it pushed the L-BFGS-B over th

Re: [R] L-BFGS-B and parscale in optim()

2011-05-25 Thread Sebastian P. Luque
On Wed, 25 May 2011 19:33:24 -0500, "Sebastian P. Luque" wrote: > which shows me that the estimate for at least one parameter is outside > the bounds. I meant the value for the parameter during the failing iteration, not the estimate, of course. -- Seb

Re: [R] L-BFGS-B and parscale in optim()

2011-05-25 Thread Sebastian P. Luque
On Wed, 25 May 2011 23:46:02 +, Ben Bolker wrote: > Sebastian P. Luque gmail.com> writes: >> Hi, >> When using method L-BFGS-B along with a parscale argument, should the >> lower and upper bounds provided be on the scaled or unscaled values? >> Thanks. > I think you can figure this out b

Re: [R] L-BFGS-B and parscale in optim()

2011-05-25 Thread Ben Bolker
Sebastian P. Luque gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > When using method L-BFGS-B along with a parscale argument, should the > lower and upper bounds provided be on the scaled or unscaled values? > Thanks. I think you can figure this out by experimentation on your own, but I believe that all of t

[R] L-BFGS-B and parscale in optim()

2011-05-25 Thread Sebastian P. Luque
Hi, When using method L-BFGS-B along with a parscale argument, should the lower and upper bounds provided be on the scaled or unscaled values? Thanks. Cheers, -- Seb __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PL