Re: [R] Interaction terms in logistic regression using glm

2010-04-30 Thread Andrew Miles
Thanks for this, Kjetil. I see that I was getting interpretation and estimation confused. My apologies on not including the paper title. For the benefit of those who read this post after me, it is: Ai, Chunrong, and Edward C. Norton. 2003. "Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models." E

Re: [R] Interaction terms in logistic regression using glm

2010-04-30 Thread Greg Snow
nal Message- > From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r- > project.org] On Behalf Of Kjetil Halvorsen > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 8:46 PM > To: Andrew Miles > Cc: r-help@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R] Interaction terms in logistic regression using glm &g

Re: [R] Interaction terms in logistic regression using glm

2010-04-29 Thread Kjetil Halvorsen
see comments below. On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Andrew Miles wrote: > I recently became aware of the article by Ai and Norton (2003) about how > interaction terms are problematic in nonlinear regression (such as logistic > regression).  They offer a correct way of estimating interaction effe

[R] Interaction terms in logistic regression using glm

2010-04-28 Thread Andrew Miles
I recently became aware of the article by Ai and Norton (2003) about how interaction terms are problematic in nonlinear regression (such as logistic regression). They offer a correct way of estimating interaction effects and their standard errors. My question is: Does the glm() function t