Thomas Lumley wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
>
>>
>> thanks for the explanation. for the sake of rvalues, please do not fix
>> this bug. i find it useful to avoid messing with = and <-.
>>
>
> If you insist on calling it a bug, the chances of its getting fixed
> are higher
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
thanks for the explanation. for the sake of rvalues, please do not fix
this bug. i find it useful to avoid messing with = and <-.
If you insist on calling it a bug, the chances of its getting fixed are higher.
-thomas
Thomas Lumley
Thomas Lumley wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
>
>> thanks. so it seems to be intentionally parsable, though i wouldn't say
>> that this gives a meaning to ':=' -- the operator has a syntactic
>> category, but no semantics. the syntactic category does not imply any
>> semant
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
thanks. so it seems to be intentionally parsable, though i wouldn't say
that this gives a meaning to ':=' -- the operator has a syntactic
category, but no semantics. the syntactic category does not imply any
semantics, as in
'<-' = function(a,
Romain Francois wrote:
> This is probably due to that in the gram.y file :
>
> case ':':
>if (nextchar(':')) {
>if (nextchar(':')) {
>yylval = install(":::");
>return NS_GET_INT;
>}
>else {
>yylval = install("::");
>return NS_GET;
>
Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
Berwin A Turlach wrote:
G'day Carl,
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:11:19 -0400
Carl Witthoft wrote:
But seriously: can someone explain to me what's going on in the
rvalues.r code? I tried a simple experiment, replacing ":=" with a
"colec" in the code, and of c
Berwin A Turlach wrote:
> G'day Carl,
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:11:19 -0400
> Carl Witthoft wrote:
>
>
>
>> But seriously: can someone explain to me what's going on in the
>> rvalues.r code? I tried a simple experiment, replacing ":=" with a
>> "colec" in the code, and of course the line
>
Berwin A Turlach wrote:
> G'day Carl,
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:11:19 -0400
> Carl Witthoft wrote:
>
>
>> >From: Wacek Kusnierczyk
>> >Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:58:49 +0100
>>
>>
>> >just for fun, you could do this with multiassignment, e.g., using
>> >the (highly experimental and prematu
Berwin A Turlach wrote:
> G'day Carl,
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:11:19 -0400
> Carl Witthoft wrote:
>
>
>> >From: Wacek Kusnierczyk
>> >Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:58:49 +0100
>>
>>
>> >just for fun, you could do this with multiassignment, e.g., using
>> >the (highly experimental and prematu
G'day Carl,
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:11:19 -0400
Carl Witthoft wrote:
> >From: Wacek Kusnierczyk
> >Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:58:49 +0100
>
>
> >just for fun, you could do this with multiassignment, e.g., using
> >the (highly experimental and premature!) rvalues:
>
> >source('http://m
>From: Wacek Kusnierczyk
>Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:58:49 +0100
>just for fun, you could do this with multiassignment, e.g., using the
>(highly experimental and premature!) rvalues:
>source('http://miscell.googlecode.com/svn/rvalues/rvalues.r')
>if (TRUE)
> c(df1, df2) := list(4
jimdare wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to create the following if / else statement but I keep getting the
> error "Error: unexpected '}' in "size="large",center="none")
> }" (I have highlighted the } in bold where the error is occuring). I can't
> seem to find a reason for this, does anyone know how I
You appear to have a number of unbalanced parentheses in your
statements. Here is one that seems to work:
if (nostocks<=3)
{data1<-test[,data1stocks];
tex1<-latex(data1, file=paste(i$Species[1], "1.tex", sep=""),
rowname = NULL,
Hi,
I tried to create the following if / else statement but I keep getting the
error "Error: unexpected '}' in "size="large",center="none")
}" (I have highlighted the } in bold where the error is occuring). I can't
seem to find a reason for this, does anyone know how I can fix it?
Thanks,
Jame
jimdare wrote:
> Thanks very much
>
>
you're welcome.
just for fun, you could do this with multiassignment, e.g., using the
(highly experimental and premature!) rvalues:
source('http://miscell.googlecode.com/svn/rvalues/rvalues.r')
if (TRUE)
c(df1, df2) := list(4:8, 9:13)
Thanks very much
Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
>
> jimdare wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How do I tell an if statement to generate two seperate outputs.
>>
>> E.g If X>5 I want to create df1 and df2:
>>
>> if (X>5) {df1<-c(4,5,6,7,8) AND df2<-c(9,10,11,12,13)}
>>
> almost there:
>
> if (X>5) {df1<-
if (X>5) {
df1<-c(4,5,6,7,8)
df2<-c(9,10,11,12,13)
}
hth,
Daniel Moreira, MD
jimdare
Sent by: r-help-boun...@r-project.org
03/22/2009 05:27 PM
To
r-help@r-project.org
cc
Subject
[R] If statement generates two outputs
Hi,
How do I tell an if statement to generate two
jimdare wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do I tell an if statement to generate two seperate outputs.
>
> E.g If X>5 I want to create df1 and df2:
>
> if (X>5) {df1<-c(4,5,6,7,8) AND df2<-c(9,10,11,12,13)}
>
almost there:
if (X>5) {df1<-c(4,5,6,7,8); df2<-c(9,10,11,12,13)}
vQ
Hi,
How do I tell an if statement to generate two seperate outputs.
E.g If X>5 I want to create df1 and df2:
if (X>5) {df1<-c(4,5,6,7,8) AND df2<-c(9,10,11,12,13)}
Thanks,
James
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/If-statement-generates-two-outputs-tp22650844p22650844.htm
19 matches
Mail list logo
