Dear David,
Thank you for the reference to Frank Harrell's excellent text. I will
read up to correct my statistical deficiencies offline.
Thank you.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 1:24 PM, David Winsemius wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Kyle Werner wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> Thank you for your
On Oct 25, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Kyle Werner wrote:
David,
Thank you for your reply. I am not using glm, but instead lrm.
Does not matter. "lrm" is giving you the same output as would glm with
a logistic link.
I am
consulting the documentation to try to parse out what the output
"Model L.R
David,
Thank you for your reply. I am not using glm, but instead lrm. I am
consulting the documentation to try to parse out what the output
"Model L.R." actually means:
http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/S/Harrell/help/Design/html/lrm.fit.html
("model likelihood ratio chi-square")
>From my read of the docum
On Oct 25, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Kyle Werner wrote:
I am trying to obtain the AICc after performing logistic regression
using the Design package. For simplicity, I'll talk about the AIC. I
tried building a model with lrm, and then calculating the AIC as
follows:
likelihood.ratio <-
unname(lrm(succ
I am trying to obtain the AICc after performing logistic regression
using the Design package. For simplicity, I'll talk about the AIC. I
tried building a model with lrm, and then calculating the AIC as
follows:
likelihood.ratio <-
unname(lrm(succeeded~var1+var2,data=scenario,x=T,y=T)$stats["Model
5 matches
Mail list logo