On 19.07.2012 22:44, zgu9 wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to build a package 'Thiele', but run into problems with generic
functions.
I have a class "Benefit", and defined the function "print.Benefit".
When I try "R CMD check Thiele" in X11, this warning came out
---
Functions/methods with usage
Hi all,
I'm trying to build a package 'Thiele', but run into problems with generic
functions.
I have a class "Benefit", and defined the function "print.Benefit".
When I try "R CMD check Thiele" in X11, this warning came out
---
Functions/methods with usage in documentation object 'Benefit'
On 01/31/2011 12:15 PM, Elliot Joel Bernstein wrote:
> I'm trying to write a generic function that calls different methods
> depending on the structure of the argument, but not the exact type of
> its contents. For example, the function 'nan2last' below works for a
> numeric vector but not for a ve
I'm trying to write a generic function that calls different methods depending
on the structure of the argument, but not the exact type of its contents. For
example, the function 'nan2last' below works for a numeric vector but not for a
vector of Date objects. Is there any way to make it work on
Hi WizaRds!
I don't know if my understanding of models is screwed up or
if there's a fundamental limitation to the way they are
used in R.
Here's what I'd like to do: create a model and then test data
against that model using generics like 'predict' and 'residuals'.
The problem is that generics
See the 'useAsDefault' argument to setGeneric.
As an aside, if 'setType<-' is meant to be a 'setter' to change the
value of a slot 'type', then I find the syntax a little redundant --
it's use
> setType(x) <- "foo"
implies that it is already a 'setter' without 'set' at the front. Why
not jus
Hi
I have some problems in defining new generic functions and classes. Just
have a look at the following example:
require(fPortfolio)
setClass("PROBECLASS",
representation(
type="character"
)
)
isGeneric("setType
7 matches
Mail list logo
