Re: [R] GLM different results with the same factors

2011-07-29 Thread gaiarrido
Thanks very much again, I´m reading some papers and articles about this issue and I think i´m starting to understand the problem. And thanks for the link to Professor Fox about the non-sequential Anova. I'll be back with more doubts. I'm sure of that. - Mario Garrido Escudero PhD student Dpto

Re: [R] GLM different results with the same factors

2011-07-28 Thread Mark Difford
On Jul 27, 2011 gaiarrido wrote: > I've been reading these days about what you tell me, but i don't > understand properly. > How could I know, with this tests, which variables are significant?... Mario, You need to get in touch with a statistician at your university. You are fitting quite a comp

Re: [R] GLM different results with the same factors

2011-07-27 Thread gaiarrido
Ok, thanks, I've been reading these days about what you tell me, but i don't understand properly. How could I know, with this tests, which variables are significant? I know my dependent variable depends on the lcc and on the edadysexo. but only one per test seems to be significant. Thanks again -

Re: [R] GLM different results with the same factors

2011-07-24 Thread Mark Difford
On Jul 24, 2011 Gaiarrido wrote: > Why the order of the factors give different results? I suppose it's > because the order of the > factors, i've just changed "lcc" from the first position to the last in > the model, and the significance > change completely > ...snip < > Ijow can i know what's c

[R] GLM different results with the same factors

2011-07-24 Thread gaiarrido
I've read something about this problem, but I don't know how can i avoid this problem. Why the order of the factors give different results? I suppose it's because the order of the factors, i've just changed "lcc" from the first position to the last in the model, and the significance change complete