Of course, you might just try a more powerful approach. Duncan responded to the
obvious issue earlier,
but the second problem seems to need the analytic derivatives of the nlsr
package. Note that
nlsLM uses the SAME very simple forward difference derivative approximation for
the Jacobian.
Optimi
Dear duncan,
Sorry to bother you with such a silly mistake I
didn,t notice it!
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 6:01 PM
To: akshay kulkarni; R help Mailing list
Subject: Re: [R] Fw: problem with nlsLM function
On 19/03/2019 8:26 a.m., akshay kulkarni wrote
On 19/03/2019 8:26 a.m., akshay kulkarni wrote:
dear members,
also,I can provide HM1,HM2 and HM3 if needed
From: R-help on behalf of akshay kulkarni
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 5:43 PM
To: R help Mailing list
Subjec
3 matches
Mail list logo
