Re: [R] For loop indicies

2011-12-12 Thread Thomas Chesney
m...@yahoo.de] Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 11:59 AM To: Thomas Chesney Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] For loop indicies You may want to check how your loop "misses out" the zero: C <- 5 for (i in 0:C) print(i) ## gives me [1] 0 [1] 1 [1] 2 [1] 3 [1] 4 [1] 5 Regards

Re: [R] For loop indicies

2011-12-12 Thread Enrico Schumann
You may want to check how your loop "misses out" the zero: C <- 5 for (i in 0:C) print(i) ## gives me [1] 0 [1] 1 [1] 2 [1] 3 [1] 4 [1] 5 Regards, Enrico Am 12.12.2011 12:44, schrieb Thomas Chesney: I would like to run a for loop with an index going from 0 to 499 but the following seems t

Re: [R] For loop indicies

2011-12-12 Thread Sarah Goslee
Hi, On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Thomas Chesney wrote: > I would like to run a for loop with an index going from 0 to 499 but the > following seems to miss out the first value: > > C <- 499 > for (i in 0:C) First off, you've named your variable for an existing function, which can cause all

Re: [R] For loop indicies

2011-12-12 Thread Andris Jankevics
Hi, what about this: C <- 0:499 for (i in C) { cat (i," ") } Best regards, Andris Jankevics AIO Groningen Bioinformatics Centre Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute University of Groningen Kerklaan 30, Haren, 9751 NN, The Netherlands On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:44, Thom

[R] For loop indicies

2011-12-12 Thread Thomas Chesney
I would like to run a for loop with an index going from 0 to 499 but the following seems to miss out the first value: C <- 499 for (i in 0:C) The alternative is: C <- 500 for (i in 1:C) { #Then every time I use i, I replace it with i-1 } Is this a good way to do it or is tere a better way? Th